Translations:Schutzbedarf/77/en: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Weitere Optionen
Isan (Diskussion | Beiträge) Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „<u>Example:</u> When do I want to create a new protection needs analysis and when a reassessment? As a rule of thumb, the first protection needs analysis should be done together in the form of an interview. This way, everything can be talked about in detail and any questions can be clarified. When new persons enter the circle of participants or when there is a change in the linked resources and/or data categories, an interview appointment can be helpful a…“ |
Isan (Diskussion | Beiträge) Übersetzungseinheit als nicht mehr veraltet markiert, ohne Änderungen |
||
(kein Unterschied)
|
Aktuelle Version vom 25. August 2025, 08:41 Uhr
Example: When do I want to create a new protection needs analysis and when a reassessment? As a rule of thumb, the first protection needs analysis should be done together in the form of an interview. This way, everything can be talked about in detail and any questions can be clarified. When new persons enter the circle of participants or when there is a change in the linked resources and/or data categories, an interview appointment can be helpful as well. For this, a new protection needs analysis is created, even if previous results are adopted. Once this first hurdle is overcome, regular, e.g., annual, reassessments of the same resources and/or data categories can be sent out as self assessments. In this case, the same persons take part in the analysis and the same resources and/or data categories are talked about as before. Basically, you are just checking whether anything has changed in the protection needs in the meantime, e.g., the last year. Here, the workflow plans offer support.