Menü aufrufen
Toggle preferences menu
Persönliches Menü aufrufen
Nicht angemeldet
Ihre IP-Adresse wird öffentlich sichtbar sein, wenn Sie Änderungen vornehmen.

Target Score Gewichtung/en: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus HITGuard User Guide
Faha (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „If enabled, the sorting of protection targets is based on the target maturity weighting. The greater the deviation from the target maturity level and the great…“
Faha (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
 
(16 dazwischenliegende Versionen von 2 Benutzern werden nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
=== Target maturity weighting===
=== Target score weighting===


Wherever deviations occur, there is an additional form of sorting, the target maturity weighting. E.g. under "Risk Management → Vulnerabilities → Gaps".
Wherever deviations occur, there is an additional form of sorting, the target score weighting. E.g. under "Risk Management → Vulnerabilities → Gaps".


If enabled, the sorting of protection targets is based on the target maturity weighting. The greater the deviation from the target maturity level and the greater the weighting of the protection target, the greater the target maturity weighting: target maturity weighting = deviation level * weighting of the protection target.
If enabled, the sorting of protection targets is based on the target score weighting. The greater the deviation from the target score level and the greater the weighting of the protection target, the greater the target score weighting: target score weighting = deviation level * weighting of the protection target.


Anmerkung: Eine Beantwortung mit "Nein" entspricht Reifegrad 1, "Teilweise" entspricht Reifegrad 3.
Note: A response of "No" corresponds to score level 1, "Partially" corresponds to score level 3.


Beispiele zur Veranschaulichung: Gewichtung des Schutzzieles: Mittel (3)
Examples for illustration: Target score weighting: Mean (3).
*Reifegrad der Abweichung = 2, Zielreifegrad = 4 => Abweichungsgrad = 2, Zielreifegrad-Gewichtung = 2 * 3 = 6.
*score of deviation = 2, target score = 4 => Degree of deviation = 2, target score weighting = 2 * 3 = 6.
*Reifegrad der Abweichung = 4, Zielreifegrad = 4 => Abweichungsgrad = 0, Zielreifegrad-Gewichtung = 0 * 3 = 0.
*score of deviation = 4, target score = 4 => degree of deviation = 0, target score weighting = 0 * 3 = 0.




[[Datei:Zielreifegrad Gewichtung anwenden.gif|left|thumb|900px|Zielreifegrad Gewichtung anwenden]]<br clear=all>
[[Datei:Zielreifegrad Gewichtung anwenden.gif|left|thumb|900px|Apply target score weighting]]<br clear=all>

Aktuelle Version vom 8. September 2022, 05:50 Uhr

Target score weighting

Wherever deviations occur, there is an additional form of sorting, the target score weighting. E.g. under "Risk Management → Vulnerabilities → Gaps".

If enabled, the sorting of protection targets is based on the target score weighting. The greater the deviation from the target score level and the greater the weighting of the protection target, the greater the target score weighting: target score weighting = deviation level * weighting of the protection target.

Note: A response of "No" corresponds to score level 1, "Partially" corresponds to score level 3.

Examples for illustration: Target score weighting: Mean (3).

  • score of deviation = 2, target score = 4 => Degree of deviation = 2, target score weighting = 2 * 3 = 6.
  • score of deviation = 4, target score = 4 => degree of deviation = 0, target score weighting = 0 * 3 = 0.


Apply target score weighting


Inhaltsverzeichnis